Redistricting Gridlock in Indiana: Trump-Backed Super PACs Target GOP Lawmakers

Indianapolis, IN – A group of super Political Action Committees (PACs) aligned with President Donald Trump is mobilizing significant resources to challenge several Republican lawmakers in Indiana who are resisting a push for revised congressional district boundaries. The effort represents another front in the ongoing battle over redistricting efforts following the 2024 election.

Turning Point Action, an influential pro-Trump super PAC, has announced that it will partner with other Trump-aligned committees to mount campaigns against these elected officials. The operation is expected to involve substantial spending, potentially reaching eight figures, aimed at ousting lawmakers seen as obstacles to what Turning Point portrays as the president’s agenda for redistricting.

Andrew Kolvet, a spokesperson for Turning Point Action, emphasized that Indiana serves as an example of growing opposition from some ranks within the Republican Party itself. He stated, “We look at Indiana as a test case — and a cautionary tale. This is a high priority, and we’ll work with local grassroots to ensure their voices are heard and their priorities aren’t overshadowed by what we see as an out-of-touch bureaucratic class.”

The push for redistricting began earlier this week when the Indiana House Republicans released a draft map designed to maximize Republican gains across all nine congressional districts. This initial proposal has faced immediate backlash, with opponents arguing it prioritizes partisan advantage over fair representation.

On Friday, the measure gained momentum as the full House approved Trump’s demand to proceed with redrawing boundaries, sending the proposal for consideration by the state Senate—a step that now faces significant hurdles given mixed sentiment within conservative ranks. While the draft map enjoys support from President-aligned groups and the administration of Governor Eric Holcomb, its path through the state senate remains uncertain due to strong resistance.

Senate leaders have indicated they will not endorse the plan without further revision or compromise, with at least some Republican senators expressing concerns about fairness and democratic principles in reapportionment.