Democratic Attorneys General Prepare Legal Countermeasures Against Trump Administration’s Election Overreach
Washington, DC, Attorney General Karl Racine speaks during a press conference announcing in Washington, DC, on June 12, 2017. Racine and Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh announced plans to file a lawsuit against US President Donald Trump arguing he is violating anti-corruption clauses in the Constitution by allowing his businesses to accept payments from foreign governments. / AFP PHOTO / JIM WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
Democratic attorneys general across the nation are mobilizing legal strategies to counter potential actions by the Trump administration that could disrupt federal election oversight ahead of midterms. The group has conducted months of scenario planning and coordination for possible court challenges if the administration moves to interfere with voting operations, including efforts involving voting machines, mail-in ballot delivery, or federal personnel deployment at polling sites.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated the group is preparing for a range of scenarios, citing President Trump’s history of election-related comments. Nineteen Democratic attorneys general previously filed a lawsuit challenging a Trump executive order on voting rules; portions were later blocked by courts. When the Department of Justice deployed election monitors to polling locations in New Jersey and California last November, Bonta arranged for state observers to counter that effort.
Recent remarks from Trump and his administration have intensified these preparations. Earlier this month, Trump urged Republicans to “nationalize” voting and suggested federal intervention to address what he claims are irregularities in major cities such as Atlanta, Detroit, and Philadelphia. Washington Attorney General Nick Brown noted that Democratic officials are considering legal theories the administration might pursue and how best to respond in court.
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson countered that Democrats seek to undermine election integrity efforts and argued that federal law grants the Justice Department authority to ensure states comply with election requirements, including maintaining accurate voter rolls. She also highlighted Trump’s support for the SAVE America Act, which would impose a national photo identification requirement for voting and tighten mail-in ballot rules.
Democratic attorneys general oppose the SAVE America Act and other administration proposals, arguing they would restrict access to voting. Supporters contend the measures aim to ensure only properly registered voters can cast ballots. The group also expressed concern about potential federal law enforcement presence near polling locations, though ICE Acting Director Todd Lyons stated there is no reason for agents to be deployed to polling facilities.
A multistate lawsuit seeking to block portions of Trump’s executive order remains pending in lower courts. Additionally, the FBI obtained a search warrant in January to seize hundreds of boxes of ballots from election offices in Fulton County, Georgia as part of a criminal investigation into possible “deficiencies or defects” in the 2020 vote count—the county that Trump and his allies have repeatedly cited as central to their claims about widespread improprieties in that election.